Local Government Elections Must Be held
Separately[edited ]
By Dumisani O.
Nkomo
It’s election
year again and as usual the usual suspects are out there promising everything
to everyone, everywhere they go. Pertinently below the rubble, of harmonized
elections lies a very important plebiscite, local government elections. I would
like to strongly argue that like in the past local government or council
elections should be separated from presidential and parliamentary elections.
The decision to have harmonized elections leading to the requisite legal
alignment was largely a cost cutting administrative decision but it came a very
big long term cost as the electorate now does not give a hoot about municipal
elections because of its obsession with the presidential and parliamentary
elections.
Importance of Local Government
Local government
in my humble opinion is the most foundational basis of a democracy as it is
that tier of government that citizens are most able to interact with. Local
government should thus be afforded the importance due to it as it relates to
the daily of people. However because local government elections have been
lumped with legislative and presidential
elections, the importance of this vital tier of government has been buried in
an avalanche of electoral infatuation. Hardly anybody takes note of local
government elections when they vote since most people tend to vote in a linear
fashion rather than laterally. By this I mean the voting behaviour of people in
Zimbabwe is that they tend to vote for the party or in a single block fashion
without laterally and cognitively taking into account the multiple level
requirements or imperatives for each level of governance. Subsequently voters
are most likely to vote for their presidential candidate preference and then
vote for a legislator and councillor from the same party without necessarily
exploring the merits or demerits of the individual councillor they are voting
for. The political erotica adrenalin of the presidential candidates and the adrenaline of the parliamentary elections
reduces the local government contest to a farce. Vital issues relating to and
related to local governance, service delivery and local economic development
are hence compromised in the process.
Specifically at
local government level there are peculiar issues which are not necessarily at
stake at national level and these pertain to:
1. Service Delivery
The primary
mandate of local authorities is to provide services to residents including
provision of clean water , refuse collection , roads and recreational
facilities. People that contest at this level must therefore demonstrate capacity
or propensity for the same. If government elections were held separately it
would be easier to identify individuals and political parties that are best
positioned to deliver at local level. At an individual municipal candidate
level the electorate is able to measure the candidate’s personal plan or manifestoes
versus the service delivery needs of residents.
Political
parties with the best manifestoes to address local issues can also be then
elected at such a level but in a national harmonized plebiscite they are all
too often buried in gigantic electoral avalanches. Beyond elections it is also
easier to hold the successful councillor to account since councillors reside
locally and are accessible unlike presidential and parliamentary candidates who
tend to be more distant. In the hullaballoo of harmonized elections, hardly
anybody remembers the issues at stake and as such basic service delivery issues
are dumped at the altar of electoral and political expedience. It is desirable
at times to have smaller geo specific interest based political parties winning
at local government level rather than having big parties winning at all levels.
This brings about a greater checks and balances than having dominant political
parties at all levels.
Local Economic Development
Local government
addresses issues to do with local economic development which may differ from
broader macro level issues at stake at national level . Municipal elections
clearly identify those with capacity to address local economic development
issues.
Political Rationale
The system of
separating local government elections from legislative and presidential
elections will also help political parties to assess their popularity and
improve their performance at national level . Local government elections can
thus be a useful instrument of measuring the political relevance, popularity
and chances of political players.
After all is
said and done there must be a separation of local government elections from
parliamentary and presidential elections.
Dumisani Nkomo
is the Chief Executive Officer of Habakkuk Trust. He writes here in his
personal capacity
No comments:
Post a Comment