Sunday, 6 March 2011

WEAKNESSES AND STRENGTHS OF M.D.C -T

ELECTIONS-STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESESS OF  M.D.C T
BY Dumisani O. Nkomo-Dumisani O Nkomo is the chief executive officer of Habakkuk Trust and the principal spokesperson of the Matabeleland Civil Society Consortium .He writes here in his personal capacity .
The major weakness of Zimbabwe’s main opposition parties continues to be their  failure to dictate the political pace ,course and direction of the country .They also suffer from a debilitating inability to put their differences aside to face a common enemy and choose to waste time and energy trading petty insults whilst the nation burns .I will attempt to make a cursory scan of the  major political parties in Zimbabwe  that present the strongest challenge to ZANU PF ,their competencies ,their deficiencies ,level of preparedness for elections and their chances in elections if such an eventuality becomes a reality .This article will specifically focus on the M.D.C T whilst subsequent articles will scrutinize the M.D.C M and the revived ZAPU .
I would like to preamble this article by noting that  tragically elections in Zimbabwe and Africa in general are not about ideas ,policies and election of sound leaders but are  rather are a  mere contest of power between belligerents with little or nothing valuable to offer to the electorate .
M.D.C.-T-Major Weaknesses
The M.D.C led by Morgan Tsvangirai stands the most realistic chance of defeating ZANU P.F and Robert Mugabe in elections .The party and it’s leader however have tragic flaws reminiscent of Shakespearean tragedies principal of which is the fact that the party has been accused of being ideologically bankrupt ,an argument which has not been convincingly rebutted .The party does not appear to have a clear and consistent ideological agenda and as such has tended to merely react to ZANU P.F .It has been accused of failing to clearly articulate it’s policies on land reform and indigenization ,weaknesses which ZANU P.F has  reveled on .Thankfully for them Zimbabwean politics at the moment is not about ideas ,ideologies and policies but rather personalities and issues of the stomach .Besides moments of brilliance from the likes of Finance minister Tendai Biti and a few others there is little indication that the party is a social democratic party with definable and tangible ideological or philosophical  distinctives  .Some people have even gone to the extent of arguing that if ZANU P.F and Mugabe did not exist ,the M.D.C.-T would struggle to justify it’s existence and relevance .The party is primarily a protest movement which thrives on the unpopularity of Robert Mugabe and ZANU PF rather than on well thought out policies based on solid ideological or philosophical foundations .






Protest Party Status
The M.D.C T seems  to be struggling to transform itself  from a protest movement to a pro active polity capable of governing the country .This is the same problem we have had with  ZANU P.F, a party which has  failed to transform itself from a liberation war movement to a proper ruling party .Consequently even though ZANU P.F left the bush thirty years ago the bush has not left them as they still believe  they are in a  war as evidenced by their political discourse ,diction ,language and mannerism .The M.D.C T should metamorphose from just being a protest movement to a proper political party with an agenda for governing the country and not revel in mistakes made by ZANU P.F as this is not sustainable in the long term .
 Structural and Organizational Deficiencies
M.D C T has been at the forefront of the  democratization agenda and it’s members have demonstrated a lot of courage and resilience in the face of state sanctioned violence .However courage and resilience are not enough in politics and any vibrant political party needs to be strategically competent .The party’s failure to mobilize its members in the constitutional outreach process is an example of how the M.D.C was outwitted and outmuscled by ZANU P.F .Whilst their leadership may pontificate that it was not their role to mobilize people ,but political reality dictates that every political party  worth its salt has  a role in mobilizing people around it’s beliefs ,policy direction and policies .They were found wanting in this regard in the constitutional outreach process which ZANU PF strategists used to gauge their strength .This strategy deficit was also evident in the manner in which the party failed to engage in effective regional lobbying at SADC level only succeeding at the level of the European Union and the Americas .Strategically this has led to the perception by some key African leaders that the M.D.C T is a western project which has  no clear understanding of the dynamics of African politics and diplomacy .This has been accentuated by disabled  international structures with a weak foreign policy engagement framework epitomized by collapsed or collapsing international party structures .Importantly however the M.D.C T does not appear to have a coherent and effective strategy at  a regional and international level to lobby on Zimbabwean issues ..The party’s foreign advocacy /mobilization strategy should not be premised on the accidental brilliance of individuals in the Diaspora but should be the product of a well
defined and refined foreign  policy matrix interwoven into stratagem imperatives defined by  think tanks on external affairs .Such a policy would enshrine a framework for engaging and mobilizing the Diaspora as an entry point for international advocacy and diplomacy  ..


Structural Defects and Inertia
The constitutional  outreach process proved that the M.D.C T has ineffective grassroots structures and  is dependent entirely on the unpopularity of ZANU P.F and the popularity of the  “Morgan Tsvangirai brand “.Factionalism and accusations of “kitchen cabinet” decision making have not helped the cause of the party which has the potential of comprehensively winning the elections even with the prevalence of violence .Importantly elections held in five to ten years time will no longer be about Mugabe or Tsvangirai but who can best govern the country .If the M.D.C  T therefore values it’s relevance to the future it should start positioning itself for the post Mugabe era .
Lack of Quality Leadership and Depth
The quality of a lot of M.D.C T councilors and members of parliament leaves a lot to be desired and could result in the party losing several seats  especially in Matabeland .There is an urgent need for the M.D.C to consider recruiting talented personnel  from various sectors of society if it is to be a respectable and effective political movement  capable not only of defeating ZANU P.F but more importantly running the country and not running it down .The party [M.D.C. T should be careful lest it be destroyed by  the “we died for this country “syndrome which alienates a lot of gifted individuals who could add value to the democracy and transformation  agenda .
I will not dwell much on the strengths of the party as the object of these articles to knee jerk progressive political parties into remedying their deficiencies .Briefly however the strengths of the M.D.C T are :
1.Their mass appeal to ordinary Zimbabweans who identify with it’s grassroots origins .
2.The party ‘s position as the only movement at the moment capable of defeating  ZANU P.F in an election as evidenced by the massive gains it made even in traditional ZANU P. F strongholds in the 2008 harmonized elections .People may thus be moved to backing a party with the necessary electoral aptitude to change the political direction of the nation vis a vis an election contest .
3.The charisma of Morgan Tsvangirai at grassroots level .Whilst Welshmen Ncube ,Dumiso Dabengwa and Arthur Mutambara may possess admirable leadership skills they lack charisma ,especially that charisma which appeals to toiling masses and not just middle class or upper middle class appeal .This[the working class ,informal sector and rural folk ] is the strata of the populace which determines the outcome of elections .
4.The outstanding brilliance of individuals such as Chamisa ,Biti and the commitment of its youth cadre ship .
5.It’s  willingness and openness to advice to stakeholders outside the corridors of power .
6.It’s understanding of grassroots issues and ability to resonate with alienated voices .This singular factor makes the party the most popular political party in Zimbabwe as the electorate are currently interested in those who scratch where it itches .The electorate is not interested in what it considers to be abstract upper middle class pre occupation with ideologies but rather with political parties that promise bread on their tables whether or not both the tables or indeed the bread exists may be another issue altogether .Again the merits or demerits of the propensities or preferences of the electorate are not the subject of this article but the plain facts on the ground indicate the electorate’s affinity with “popular protest movements  for the next few years anyway .The M.D.C T ‘s propensity for theatrics can also be viewed as strength in the rough terrains of African politics .
I will continue with my critique of other political parties in subsequent articles .


No comments:

Post a Comment